{"id":1136,"date":"2023-01-13T19:00:47","date_gmt":"2023-01-14T03:00:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/loopcntr.net\/musings\/?p=1136"},"modified":"2023-01-13T19:47:17","modified_gmt":"2023-01-14T03:47:17","slug":"internet-hopes-and-fears-in-10-years","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/loopcntr.net\/musings\/internet-hopes-and-fears-in-10-years\/","title":{"rendered":"Internet hopes and fears in 10 years"},"content":{"rendered":"\r\n

I just filled out a survey about what I think the best and worst consequences of digital technology are going to be for humans. I’m in a sort of cynical mood but perhaps you’ll find my responses interesting. If you find the questions stimulating, do feel free to reply with some of your own answers. I love comparing points of view.

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\r\n

BEST AND MOST BENEFICIAL\u00a0changes

* Human-centered development of digital tools and systems – safely advancing human progress in these systems<\/strong><\/em>
Nature\u2019s experiments are random, not intentional or goal directed. We humans operate in a similar way, exploring what is possible and then trimming away most of the more hideous outcomes. We will continue to develop devices that do the tasks humans used to do thereby saving us both mental and physical labor. This trend will continue resulting in more leisure time available for non-survival pursuits.

* Human connections, governance and institutions \u2013 improving social and political interactions<\/strong><\/em>
We will continue to enjoy expanded synchronous communication that will include an increasing variety of sensory data. Whatever we can transmit in near real time we will also be able to store and retrieve to enjoy later – even after death. This could result in improved social and political interactions but not necessarily.

* Human rights – abetting good outcomes for citizens.<\/strong><\/em>
Increased communication will not advance human \u201crights\u201d but it might make human \u201cwrongs\u201d more visible so that they can be diminished.

* Human knowledge – verifying, updating, safely archiving and elevating the best of it<\/strong><\/em>
Advances in digital storage and retrieval will let us preserve and transmit larger quantities of human knowledge. Whether what is stored is verifiable, safe, or worthy of \u201celevation\u201d is an age-old question and not significantly changed by digitization.

* Human health and well-being – helping people be safer, healthier, happier<\/strong><\/em>
Huge advances in medicine and the ability to manipulate genetics are in store. This will be beneficial to some segments of the population. Agricultural efficiency resulting in increased plant-based food production as well as artificial, meat-like protein will provide the possibility of eliminating human starvation. This could translate into improved well-being – or not.

* Other – you are welcome to write about an area that does not fit in the categories listed above<\/strong><\/em>
IMHO, the most beneficial outcomes of our \u201cstore and forward\u201d technologies are to empower individuals to access the world\u2019s knowledge and visual demonstrations of skill directly, without requiring an educational institution to act as \u201cmiddleman\u201d. Learners will be able to hail teachers and learning resources just like they call a ride service today.<\/p>\r\n

\"yellow<\/a>
MOST HARMFUL OR MENACING changes

The biggest threat to humanity posed by current digital advances is the possibility of switching from an environment of scarcity to one of abundance. Humans evolved, both physically and psychologically, as prey animals eeking out a living from an inadequate supply of resources. Those who survived were both fearful and aggressive, protecting their genetic relatives, hoarding for their families, and driving away or killing strangers and nonconformists. Although our species has come a long way toward peaceful and harmonious self-actualization,\u00a0 vestiges of the old fearful behavior persist. \u2028\u2028Consider what motivates the continuance of copyright laws when the marginal cost of providing access to a creative work approaches zero. Should the author continue to be paid beyond the cost of producing the work?

* Human-centered development of digital tools and systems – falling short of advocates’ goals<\/strong><\/em>
This is a repeat of the gun violence argument. Does the problem lie with the existence of the gun or the actions of the shooter?

* Human connections, governance and institutions \u2013 endangering social and political interactions<\/strong><\/em>
Any major technology change endangers the social and political status quo. The question is, can humans adapt to the new actions available to them. We are seeing new opportunities to build marketplaces for the exchange of goods and services. This is creating new opportunities to scam each other in some very old (snake oil) and very new (online ransomware) ways. We don\u2019t yet know how to govern or regulate these new abilities. In addition, although the phenomenon of confirmation bias or echo chambers is not exactly new (think \u201cChristendom\u201d in 15th century Europe), word travels faster and crowds are larger than they were 6 centuries ago. So is digital technology any more threatening today than guns and roads were then? Every generation believe the end is nigh and brought on by change toward \u201cwickedness\u201d. If change is dangerous than we are certainly in for it!

* Human rights \u2013 harming the rights of citizens<\/strong><\/em>
The biggest threat here is that humans will not be able to overcome their fear and permit their fellows to enjoy the benefits of abundance brought about by automation and AI.

* Human knowledge \u2013 compromising or hindering progress.<\/strong><\/em>
The threat lies in increasing human dependance on machines – both mechanical and digital. We are at risk of forgetting how to take care of ourselves without them. Increasing leisure and abundance might seem like “progress” but they can also lull us into believing that we don\u2019t need to stay mentally and physically fit and agile.

* Human health and well-being – threatening individuals\u2019 safety, health and happiness<\/strong><\/em>
In today\u2019s context of increasing ability to extend healthy life, the biggest threat is human overpopulation. We don’t get too upset if thousands of lemmings jump off a cliff but a large number of human deaths is a no no, no matter how small a percentage of the total population it is. Humanity cannot continue to improve its \u201chealth and well-being\u201d indefinitely if it remains planet bound. Our choices are to put more effort into building extraterrestrial human habitat or self-limiting our numbers. In the absences of one of these alternatives, one group of humans is going to be deciding which members of other groups live or die. This is not a likely recipe for human happiness.

* Other – you are welcome to write about an area that does not fit in the categories listed above<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\r\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\r\n

Share this:<\/h3>